People say there are two areas of discussion friends ought not pursue: religion and politics. Yet, it seems to me these are two of the most important areas of our lives and they deserve civil dialogue.The key word here is “civil.” To be civil is to be respectful which requires listening and close attention. Today it seems nearly impossible to bear witness to such discussions. Talking heads and pundits have created a style of “dialogue” which is less dialogue than haranguing. Nothing is accomplished by one person interrupting, brow-beating, putting down, or competing. All these methods accomplish is to gain ratings on talk shows, polarize conversations and dumb-down our everyday ability to talk with one another. Recourse to “talking points” or catch phrases limits depth and discourages actual conversation.
This loss of ability to discourse is a sorry state of affairs and a dangerous one. When civilized people cannot talk with one another nothing is learned; “opposing” camps remain polarized, and nothing changes. In fact, if anything, things get worse.
One reason politics and religion seem off-limits is that they are, indeed, important. Not only are they important, they are near and dear to us. Our faith tradition is key to our moral understanding, politics enables our faith to be the undergirding of our choices and decisions related to our governance. Since these both are near and dear, we want to hold onto them. Yet, from a literal perspective, everything changes. Many of us refuse to understand and accept this truth so we suffer.
The Buddha taught we should speak with mindfulness, care and compassion. He called this “Right Speech.” By right he didn’t quite mean incorrect or wrong. I believe he meant true, as in the line is true or the measure is true. It is what it says it is, and in speech, follows a middle way. To do this requires a few qualities: patience and forbearance, a willingness to listen, and a willingness to consider what is being said to which we will then respond.
The next time we are in a discussion, let’s try to leave the sarcasm, cliched phrases, and desire to win out of the picture. It is said in the Zen world, moku rai or “silence is thunder.” Sometimes just listening helps as it allows those we are talking with to more fully outline their position. We shouldn’t be afraid of this or our opposing friend’s words (I believe much of the pundit’s tactics are derived from a basic fear that the other person will indeed have an opportunity to sway.) Our case should rest on its own merits without recourse to violating the precept against putting others down in order to elevate ourselves.
Right speech is a challenge to us today, yet without it civil discourse is made impossible. The result is that we don’t learn, nor are we able to reach a solution to our differences. If we want a more peaceful community, perhaps this is one way to get there.
1 comment:
Choosing to be part of a conversation, one can do it with an attitude of expanding their view. Or they can want to merely express their own perspective. Maybe even, it's a fear/loss equation? What are they afraid of losing if they sit quietly and attentively listen? What do they hope to gain with ridicule and sarcasm? Intention is key.
Post a Comment